Global Innovative Education

Three Countries in a Year: How THINK Global School Made the Whole Earth Its Schoolhouse

A roving high school with no fixed address takes its students through three countries a year, finishing three years of high school out in the real world.

1. A High School Packed in a Suitcase

For most schools in the world, you can jab a point on a map: it's on that street, at that number. THINK Global School (TGS) can't be jabbed. Because it has no fixed address at all.

It's an international high school founded in 2010. Its students are few, drawn from all over the world, and across three years of high school they change countries every term — three a year. Iceland, Japan, Greece, Botswana, Bhutan, Peru, India… these places aren't sightseeing stops on a study trip; they're where the students truly "go to school" for that stretch of time. The whole school, teachers and students together, relocates like this, one stop at a time.

It gives this practice a name: the "Changemaker Curriculum." It sounds grand, but on the ground it's quite concrete: in each country, learning grows out of the real issues happening on that land.

2. How It Actually Runs

In Iceland they study geothermal energy and sustainability; in Bhutan they puzzle over "Gross National Happiness," a governing idea found nowhere else; on a coast threatened by climate change, they take on real environmental problems. The subjects — science, history, math, writing — haven't vanished; they're stitched into these real projects: to study geothermal energy you can't get around physics and geology; to write a research report you have to practice writing and data.

This is exactly what Dewey argued in *Experience and Education*: the essence of education is the continual growth of experience, and knowledge becomes truly a person's own only when it's used and tested in interaction with real situations. Sitting in a classroom memorizing "Iceland is rich in geothermal energy" is one thing; standing beside a steaming geothermal plant, measuring the data with your own hands, then writing the report, is another. TGS makes the latter the norm.

Its teachers are no longer mainly "lecturers" but more like designers and guides of projects — helping students turn a country's real issues into learning tasks you can dig into. Assessment, too, rests not on a standardized paper but on what you actually made and what you figured out.

3. What It Breaks

What it breaks is the wall between learning and life.

We're too used to one arrangement: a child first "learns the knowledge well" in the classroom, in the textbook, and then, grown up and graduated, takes it off to "apply in the real world." Learning and using are cut into two stages, a dozen years apart. The result is often a child who has learned a bellyful of things with no relation to his own life, knowing neither what he's learning for nor feeling any use in having learned it — which is exactly the industrial education Ken Robinson criticizes in *Creative Schools*, processing children to a standard procedure while drawing the meaning and passion out.

TGS pushes that wall down: learning is, on the spot, living; living is, on the spot, learning. What you study is the real, present difficulty of the country you're living in, and what you make might genuinely be useful to the place. Learning and using are no longer two stages — they're the same thing.

4. What This Means for a Child Who Hates School

Many children who hate school are in fact asking the same question no one answers head-on: "what's the use of learning this?" When a child is required, day after day, to memorize things he can't see bearing any relation to himself or the world, boredom is all but inevitable — this isn't laziness; this kind of learning really has had the meaning drawn out of it.

TGS's answer is direct: join learning back to the real world, and the meaning returns on its own. When what you study is what's happening on the ground beneath your feet, and what you make might really help someone, the question "what's the use of learning this" falls apart by itself. A child who has recovered a sense of meaning usually needs no pushing.

It also points to the state Csikszentmihalyi describes in *Flow*: when a person throws himself wholly into something of just the right difficulty that he genuinely cares about, he forgets time, forgets fatigue, and learns deeply and joyfully. The living, challenging, consequential projects of the real world draw a person into flow far more easily than a worksheet ever could.

Of course, not every child can travel the world. But the core TGS lands on is one any education willing to change can use: lead the child out from in front of the life-stripped textbook, and let him learn in the real world, for real things. A child who has shut his heart to the classroom may only be waiting for a chance to be led back into the real world and lit up again. Give him a piece of real ground to stand on, and the light in his eyes often returns.

REFERENCES

  • · John Dewey, *Experience and Education*
  • · Ken Robinson, Lou Aronica, *Creative Schools*
  • · Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, *Flow*